Notes from All Groups
Group #3
Are people still excited about what they are doing?
- some excitement
- overall excited
If not, what could we do to build more excitement?
- more events like this
- get users
What does a happy outcome look like?
- sustainability
- continuation
Other
- what prevents people from using the product?
- how do we get over these?
- how do users get to the next level?
- presentation to get people interested -- produce a spark
- don't get trapped into making new features to get new users
- try to get users with what we already have
- life cycle of the project - typical
Group #2
Are people still excited about what they are doing?
- excited more recently than in the past
- have something concrete from which we can build
- will be more excited once we start developing new code again
- having users is exciting
If not, what could we do to build more excitement?
- faster release cycles
- engaging external users
- not losing momentum
- experimentation for a targeted goal
What does a happy outcome look like?
- users taking the product for granted
- having a userbase
- stable funding
What do we do if there's no funding by the end of 2008?
- Cosmo would continue on
- Chandler is more questionable at this point
- type up resumés
Group #4
Are people still excited about what they are doing?
- No
- Trending upwards
- need users, roadmap or promo
- soft launch is soft
- more wait-and-see than excitement
If not, what could we do to build more excitement?
- users
- every user-sighting
- jumping on missing features
- more agility
- "knock 'em out" (month view, overlays)
What does a happy outcome look like?
- Lots of users
- scaling problems
- active community of users with outside contributions
- doing lots of user support
What do we do if there's no funding by the end of 2008?
- disappointment
- retain same basic relationship
Group #1
Are people still excited about what they are doing?
- yes
- exhausted
- excited about:
- values of company
- roadmap
- excitement expectations are typically high
- new release process
- doesn't feel like a job
- uncertainty about current work and how it relates to overall goals of the company
- feeling more excited now
If not, what could we do to build more excitement?
- turnaround features fast
- having more QA staff
- maybe have lower quality standards in exchange for faster releases
- align better to org goals
- "pressure to produce"
- feel better when more time spent on something we want to do
- something that feels good to contribute to
- implementing features
- rolling them out quickly to users
What does a happy outcome look like?
- keep having paid jobs at OSAF
- have hundreds of thousands of users
- industry recognition
- having Cosmo being more well-known
- having non-staff devs
- more QA (staff and non-)
- having contacts
What do we do if there's no funding by the end of 2008?
- move code to google code
- hub service
- need a way to migrate data from hub to their own server
- end up working at organizations that are less aligned with what we like