r2 - 25 Sep 2007 - 15:47:42 - AparnaKadakiaYou are here: OSAF >  Journal Web  >  ContributorNotes > ReidEllisNotes > SprintMeeting20070925
Notes from All Groups

Group #3

Are people still excited about what they are doing?
  • some excitement
  • overall excited

If not, what could we do to build more excitement?

  • more events like this
  • get users

What does a happy outcome look like?

  • sustainability
  • continuation

Other

  • what prevents people from using the product?
  • how do we get over these?
  • how do users get to the next level?
  • presentation to get people interested -- produce a spark
  • don't get trapped into making new features to get new users
  • try to get users with what we already have
  • life cycle of the project - typical

Group #2

Are people still excited about what they are doing?
  • excited more recently than in the past
  • have something concrete from which we can build
  • will be more excited once we start developing new code again
  • having users is exciting

If not, what could we do to build more excitement?

  • faster release cycles
  • engaging external users
  • not losing momentum
  • experimentation for a targeted goal

What does a happy outcome look like?

  • users taking the product for granted
  • having a userbase
  • stable funding

What do we do if there's no funding by the end of 2008?

  • Cosmo would continue on
  • Chandler is more questionable at this point
  • type up resumés

Group #4

Are people still excited about what they are doing?
  • No
  • Trending upwards
  • need users, roadmap or promo
  • soft launch is soft
  • more wait-and-see than excitement

If not, what could we do to build more excitement?

  • users
  • every user-sighting
  • jumping on missing features
  • more agility
  • "knock 'em out" (month view, overlays)

What does a happy outcome look like?

  • Lots of users
  • scaling problems
  • active community of users with outside contributions
  • doing lots of user support
What do we do if there's no funding by the end of 2008?
  • disappointment
  • retain same basic relationship

Group #1

Are people still excited about what they are doing?
  • yes
  • exhausted
  • excited about:
    • values of company
    • roadmap
  • excitement expectations are typically high
  • new release process
  • doesn't feel like a job
  • uncertainty about current work and how it relates to overall goals of the company
  • feeling more excited now

If not, what could we do to build more excitement?

  • turnaround features fast
  • having more QA staff
  • maybe have lower quality standards in exchange for faster releases
  • align better to org goals
  • "pressure to produce"
    • feel better when more time spent on something we want to do
    • something that feels good to contribute to
  • implementing features
    • rolling them out quickly to users

What does a happy outcome look like?

  • keep having paid jobs at OSAF
  • have hundreds of thousands of users
  • industry recognition
  • having Cosmo being more well-known
  • having non-staff devs
  • more QA (staff and non-)
  • having contacts

What do we do if there's no funding by the end of 2008?

  • move code to google code
  • hub service
    • need a way to migrate data from hub to their own server
  • end up working at organizations that are less aligned with what we like
Edit | WYSIWYG | Attach | Printable | Raw View | Backlinks: Web, All Webs | History: r2 < r1 | More topic actions
 
Open Source Applications Foundation
Except where otherwise noted, this site and its content are licensed by OSAF under an Creative Commons License, Attribution Only 3.0.
See list of page contributors for attributions.