recurrence related bugs need to get fixed, Matt is in process of swagging
Code complete definition for server: zero bugs for release candidate
39 bugs right now -- re-examine to see if they should block the release
Most important thing: make sure QA not blocked
Rebranding, release announcements -- should not be counted against total for code complete
Bobby is looking at performance
Ted waiting for the swags to come in before giving schedule update
Next step: Pass through the p2s/p3s? tomorrow afternoon
week after code complete for release
Daily QA sessions, bug council every other day
Desktop
Supposed to hit ZBR today, have 45 bugs, not 39
Most people at 3/4 bugs: 5 day estimate (need to sync up with Stearns after oscon)
Sharing bugs still coming in, these are usually high priority. They are usually found doing roundtrip testing using data that has been accumulated over time. Edits from multiple people, different shares.
Fragile area: EIM, recurring events and triage
Next actions: Swags for new bugs, deadlines, particpate in testing sessions
Question on list: Release notes? Where are they linked from?
QA
Testing schedule this week? Next action: send out schedule for week.
Last week, didn't have a very good integration test spec. Collected scenarios with PPD team. Aparna put it down in spec: PreviewIntegrationTestSpec
Expect a peak soon in new bugs, then start to fall. No new areas after today/tomorrow, will have covered all areas.
Service
TOS? Privacy Policy? Meeting with lawyer scheduled Thursday afternoon.
TODO: translating to HTML, too long for what it is saying, integrating into cosmo UI
Next actions: Jared meeting with lawyer, Jared following up in bug
Branding related bugs: NOW is the time to get those bugs done
Final Copy Review -- Mimi is waiting for conflicts to be resolved -- ask Travis to help
list of things that can get better for hub, not on shortlist. outgoing email: Jared will open a bug to review Hub branding changes
Confident in hardware now
Benchmarking is now the issue
Bear offered help with hub related gruntwork
Feedback service is blocking QA, perhaps Bear can help
Jared worked on Run Book last week, should have full first draft by end of week. Next step to send out draft. One of the most important things is to agree on what is in the Run Book. Run Book is in subversion. Bear and Randy to review.
Non-code deliverables
Blog post interop -- Katie needs to follow up on this
Feature list, release notes, known issues
Ted to do his part.
Screencasts are necessary, Katie will own putting one together
Pieter started working on the user guide, we've signed the contract
OSCON
Put information from Ted/Mimi talk into a paper, blog?
Materials/artifacts from Windmill talk made more clearly available?