Moved the performance work, Cosmo 0.6.1 and design review periods accordingly
With those modifications, Cosmo 0.6.1 released at the beginning of May
Cosmo 0.6.1 status and plan
What's left for Cosmo 0.6.1
Still need a week to test at a developer level
Remainder of time general QA
We can't really start integration testing until we hit desktop feature freeze
Aparna - have a checkpoint of Cosmo that is compatible with Chandler
Unless we have further EIM record changes - today's build can be used
QA can start testing early before the week of developer testing
We will re-test interop with other clients - previous functionality should not break
Performance tests for Cosmo
What does the plan look like for Cosmo performance work
Randy will spend some time on this
Jared did a set of benchmarks to size the server we need to buy
We have developed any other performance testing scenarios - none for the UI
If we had the set of use cases, do we have the infrastructure to write these tests
More complicated due to latency from the network
Get some baseline numbers
Get the set of use cases we are going to target
Standard data set
Focus on a couple of problems
Seems like we can use windmill
Next action: Draft use case (Priscilla)
Next action: Hand run through the use cases for timings (Priscilla)
We can then decide what tests to write
Pick a machine that we are going to use
Get the tests run on Cosmo - need to get the baseline tests setup in time for the Cosmo team to react
Logo feedback
Petroglyph
Jared: doesn't look like much
Pieter: liked the original petroglyph better
Dog
People seem to like the playful/lively look of the second dog
Pieter likes the C
Katie doesn't like the C as much and prefers the first dog
Sheila understand the appeal of the dog but feels a bit "dogged out"
We talked a bit about dog breed and how that makes a difference
OSAF wikipedia entry
A long time ago we talked about improving OSAF entry
There is also a Chandler PIM entry and Scooby entry
License is wrong
We could fix the stuff that's factually incorrect but we should let others decide what about the project they think is important and modify most of the content.