r2 - 20 Mar 2007 - 09:52:55 - KatieCappsParlanteYou are here: OSAF >  Journal Web  >  MeetingNotes > ManagementCommitteeMeetingNotes > OperationsGroupMeetingNotes20070313

Operations group meeting notes for 2007-03-13

Attendees: Katie, Sheila, Jared, Philippe, Aparna, Ted, Mitch Priscilla and Mimi for the Logo part

Logo

Pris and Mimi introduced the semi final logos. Petroglyph not done yet. Rapid room feedback:
  • Philippe: all look really good, none so bad needs to be rejected, thinks the grass treatment is pretty good
  • Aparna: feel the grass is imbalanced
  • Sheila: like them all, grass is pretty interesting
  • Jared: think the starfish is the strongest (prosocial, adaptable)
  • Katie: would like to see them in a Windows context (not just Mac), like the pinwheel as a concept, grass appealing but not sure works fine outside desktop
  • Mitch: like grass but not sure it registers well, starfish stands out, easy to identify
  • Ted: like them all, has most feeling for the grass
Need to have a follow up discussion on the pr list.

IT : mod_mbox work

  • Revamped webui for the list archive.
  • Budget: $1500 moving forward, $600 already spent.
  • Need ops authorization. Ops approves this project.

HR : comp time non-policy

  • Informal policy was that a manager can give comp time afterward when the demand is imposed by the work environment
  • We do not however count the hours on a per person basis, we expect people behaving as professionals and taking care of that
  • Personal comp time are covered by PTO
  • For exceptional circumstances, OSAF allows unpaid leave

Strategy

Service level expectations

  • Migrations take a lot of extra hours from Cosmo devs. This may include Build and QA.
  • Outages take a similar toll on IT (Dave and Jared)
  • Will we, should we have more people on pagers? What's the expectation? Right now the expectation is "best efforts".
  • Issue is: we do not forecast a routine need for 24/7 support. The problem is how we handle the semi chaotic (with spikes) transition period till we get to the routine part of the cycle.
  • As long as we don't see issues outside the migration period, we don't see a reason to change the current practice of "best efforts".
  • Managers need to schedule this (migration) correctly and set expectation correctly for the relevant teams
  • Managers can compensate time for exceptional work load if any
  • We should talk about this at the staff meeting

Amazon hosting

  • Amazon is hosting some services (S3, EC2) allowing to use the Amazon servers (e.g. run a Cosmo cluster from there)
  • They have metering tools that would allow to run a private Cosmo instance for a small company for instance
  • Could be an option for scaling post Preview

Post preview: adoption

  • Communicate (conferences, blogs, etc...)
  • Try to recruit through connections, influential people if possible
  • Listening to user feedback, that group of people might be different to what we imagine our target to be right now
  • Need to create some specific content for launch
  • Map the traditional marketing plan with actions
  • Interop has a special link to adoption, switching (from something else) is important for adoption
  • We'll certainly want to have a faster pace of releases
  • That means to change our development process so that we allow more projects to be developed in parallel while maintaining the trunk stable
  • We also need to reach out to get developers involved

-- PhilippeBossut - 13 Mar 2007

Edit | WYSIWYG | Attach | Printable | Raw View | Backlinks: Web, All Webs | History: r2 < r1 | More topic actions
 
Open Source Applications Foundation
Except where otherwise noted, this site and its content are licensed by OSAF under an Creative Commons License, Attribution Only 3.0.
See list of page contributors for attributions.